Error can also be introduced in the way the manufacturer arrives at the value for
metabolizable energy (ME) for a product, usually expressed in kcals per gram. The most precise way to calculate ME is to take gross energy (GE) of the food fed minus products of elimination (feces,
urine and gaseous products of digestion, mostly methane). GE is the energy value of complete oxidation of the food. This is a very complex and time consuming test and will vary among species for the
same food product. Some manufacturers simply estimate ME using factors for protein, fat and carbohydrates contained in the product, but generally indicate this can vary +/- up to 5%. To the
extent a formula is mixed from multiple products, this degree of error is multiplicative.
Another source of error can be introduced by the way the rehabilitator measures the dry and wet contents of a
formula prior to mixing. The value for metabolizable energy contained in the typical nutritional analysis provided by the manufacturer is based on a precise weight for a given volume of the
product. This accurate weight of the product for a given unit of volume measure plus the accurate weight of water for the same unit of measure are critical elements to determining a value for
metabolizable energy for a formula. To the extent the rehabilitator measures or packs a dry product differently than the manufacturer, the resultant calculation will be incorrect.
Slight
changes in the manufacturing process of milk replacer products can render previously reported calculations obsolete. This may be the case for some of the dry powder products produced by PetAg®, since
many of the nutrient component percentages and kcal values are no longer correct in some of the wildlife rehabilitation literature. Since the authors of those publications do not indicate the typical
nutritional analysis data used at the time the calculations were performed, and only provide the results of the calculations, it is unclear why the reported values are incorrect.
The current typical
nutritional analysis for several of the PetAg® dry milk replacers are shown in the calculator. Using these typical nutritional analysis, the calculator provides the correct compostion and energy values
for the ratios desired for various products when mixed with water:
Feeding Regimen Also Introduces Uncertainty
Once a rehabilitator chooses a milk replacer product or combination of products to
use, the proper concentration of the formula must be determined as well as the feeding frequency. Some of the previously published suggested ratios of product to water yield a formula that is too thick
for some species to handle, such as tree squirrels. Some rehabilitators have reported that a too thick, pancake batter-like formula has caused diarrhea, dehydration and other problems, necessitating
dilution of the formula with more water. In many cases, further dilution with water requires the formula to be given more frequently to insure the proper amount of nutrients are provided to the animal
in a 24 hour period. The rehabilitator must work diligently to get an effective combination of product (or products), formula concentration, and feeding frequency to produce appropriate elimination,
proper hydration, and healthy and sustained growth and development (physical and behavioral).
Conclusion
- Nutrition is an absolutely critical component of effective rehabilitation!
- Beware of the "Cookbooks" that make formula selection look too easy. It's not. Some of these publications are out-of-date as to technical data on certain milk replacer products. They can
also be misleading in not providing appropriate cautions to the user as to the many other factors that need to be considered.
- Discuss the product specifications with the manufacturer. Don't
just rely on the label on the product (Guaranteed Analysis). Ask them for the much more complete Typical Nutritional Analysis.
- Develop and tap into your rehabilitation network. Talk with
rehabilitators from around the country that work with the same species. Use the NWRA or IWRC Membership Directories to help with contacting rehabilitators.
- Don't just "Run the Numbers".
There is much more to determining the potential success or failure of a formula.
- Use a feeding regimen that works. This is the right combination of selection of product(s); concentration
(strength or dilution); and feeding frequency. Adjust as necessary to find the right combination.
- Watch your animals closely. Develop keen observation skills. Observe regularly,
keeping periodic notes or records as necessary on each animal. Assess success by seeing healthy, normal elimination, proper hydration and sustained and regular development (weight gain, coat
development, alertness, behavior, etc.).
- As a community, we need more research on species specific nutrition and on feeding regimens that work best and produce consistent and successful results.
Those of us caring for wildlife need to significantly increase our understanding of nutrition as a major component of effective wildlife rehabilitation and encourage development of resources that are
up-to-date, accurate, and complete.
Resources
Church, D., and W. Pond. 1982. Basic Animal Nutrition and Feeding – Second Edition. John Wiley & Sons, NY.
Fowler, M. 1984. "Nutrition and Feeding or Orphaned and Injured Wild
Animals", in Wildlife Rehabilitation Volume 2. National Wildlife Rehabilitators Association, St. Cloud, MN.
Marcum, D. 1997. Rehabilitation of North American Wild Mammals – Feeding and
Nutrition. (self-published.)
Moore, A. and S. Joosten. 1997. NWRA Principles of Wildlife Rehabilitation – The Essential Guide for Novice and Experienced Rehabilitators.
National Wildlife Rehabilitators Association, St. Cloud, MN.
Pet-Ag, Inc. , 1993. Zoologic® Nutritional Components Milk Matrix Formulation and Mixing Guide. Hampshire, IL.
Pet-Ag,
Inc. Typical nutritional analysis data sheets for Esbilac®, MultiMilk, KMR® and Foal-Lac®.
White, J. 1993. Basic Wildlife Rehabilitation 1AB. International Wildlife
Rehabilitation Council, Suisin, CA.